From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Apr 21 07:05:20 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_5); 21 Apr 2003 14:05:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 14521 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2003 14:05:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 21 Apr 2003 14:05:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Apr 2003 14:05:16 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 197bv2-0008OG-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 07:05:16 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 197buh-0008Mb-00; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 07:04:56 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 21 Apr 2003 07:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 197buH-0008L7-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 07:04:34 -0700
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.6p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h3LEFasr035734
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 09:15:36 -0500 (CDT)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.6p2/8.12.3/Submit) id h3LEFZDP035733
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 09:15:35 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 09:15:35 -0500
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Quoting "zoi"
Message-ID: <20030421141535.GA35511@allusion.net>
References: <b8091g+o89d@eGroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b8091g+o89d@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-archive-position: 4877
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 08:10:24AM -0000, sshiskom wrote:
> On IRC, I tried to quote the word {zoi} and wrote {zo zoi}.
> Surprisingly, jbofi'e didn't parse it. So I checked Reference
> Grammar, and it seems ZOI takes precedence over ZO.

Where's it say that? The bnf looks like they should be at the same
level.

> Is there any reason for this? It makes quoting the word {zoi}
> difficult -- I am obliged to say {zoi gy. zoi .gy} or something
> like that. On the other hand, if ZO takes precedence over ZOI,
> the word {zo} would be {zo zo} and the word {zoi} would be
> {zo zoi}. I see no disadvantage and one advantage of this
> idea over current baseline.

Just a bug in jbofi'e. The official parser supports it (though it
does use an older version of the grammar).

-- 
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku




