From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Apr 22 09:25:01 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_5); 22 Apr 2003 16:25:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 10763 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2003 16:25:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Apr 2003 16:25:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Apr 2003 16:25:00 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 1980Zo-00065q-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 09:25:00 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 1980Zf-00065X-00; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 09:24:51 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 22 Apr 2003 09:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from postman.arcor-online.net ([151.189.0.87])
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 1980ZY-00065O-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 09:24:44 -0700
Received: from hamwpne1 (pc1-oxfd1-5-cust27.oxfd.cable.ntl.com [62.254.134.27])
  (authenticated bits=0)
  by postman.arcor-online.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3MGOeps028845
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 18:24:41 +0200 (CEST)
Organization: datenrevision GmbH & Co. OHG
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 18:24:24 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [lojban] Re: mi'e
Message-ID: <3EA588D8.29915.1B8B1B1@localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <20030422152819.55400.qmail@web20510.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <3EA5293F.7354.434169@localhost>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-description: Mail message body
X-archive-position: 4889
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: pnewton@gmx.de
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: "Philip Newton" <pnewton@gmx.de>
From: "Philip Newton" <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: pnewton@gmx.de
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

On 22 Apr 2003 at 8:28, Llambías wrote:

> i ie lu snanu zei gugdrtcosena li'u ja'a lujvo i ku'i mi 
> mutce zmanei zo nantcoso 

.i ku'i zoi zoi nantcoso zoi na lojbo valsi ki'u le nu no lojbo valsi 
cu se nenri ny. ce'o ty. ce'o cy.

ni'o do zmanei zo bertcoso .i ku'i bo cumki fa le nu finti lo lujvo fo 
lo fu'ivla .i .y. .y.

My Lojban fails me, but what I'm trying to say is that while you are 
free to prefer words of the form "nanytcoso", you cannot give as a 
reason for the preference that it is not possible to form lujvo from 
fu'ivla and that therefore, cultural gismu are required in order to 
form convenient lujvo.

mu'o mi'e .filip.
-- 
filip.niutyn. <pnewton@gmx.de>





