From phma@webjockey.net Tue Apr 22 19:27:47 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_5); 23 Apr 2003 02:27:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 71343 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2003 02:27:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 23 Apr 2003 02:27:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2003 02:27:47 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 1989z9-0003Rv-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 19:27:47 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1989yy-0003Rb-00; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 19:27:36 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 22 Apr 2003 19:27:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1989yq-0003RN-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 19:27:28 -0700 Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EB1702370; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 22:27:03 -0400 (EDT) Organization: dis To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: mi'e Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 22:27:03 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20030423000907.GA46531@allusion.net> <20030423005003.15935.qmail@web20512.mail.yahoo.com> <20030423012901.GA47223@allusion.net> In-Reply-To: <20030423012901.GA47223@allusion.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200304222227.03570.phma@webjockey.net> X-archive-position: 4895 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Pierre Abbat Reply-To: phma@webjockey.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 On Tuesday 22 April 2003 21:29, Jordan DeLong wrote: > But I *don't* prefer things like "ma'arbroda" to "cmanybroda". In > fact I don't understand the purpose of CV'V rafsi at all. What about "bisma'a" versus "bisycmana"? phma -- .i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do .ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga .icu'u la ma'atman.