From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Apr 22 19:33:13 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_5); 23 Apr 2003 02:33:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 90598 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2003 02:33:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 23 Apr 2003 02:33:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2003 02:33:12 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 198A4O-0003V9-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 19:33:12 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 198A4I-0003Uo-00; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 19:33:06 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 22 Apr 2003 19:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 198A4B-0003Uf-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 19:32:59 -0700 Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.6p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h3N2iDsr048419 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 21:44:14 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com) Received: (from fracture@localhost) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.6p2/8.12.3/Submit) id h3N2iDkk048418 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 21:44:13 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 21:44:13 -0500 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: mi'e Message-ID: <20030423024413.GA48362@allusion.net> References: <20030423000907.GA46531@allusion.net> <20030423005003.15935.qmail@web20512.mail.yahoo.com> <20030423012901.GA47223@allusion.net> <200304222227.03570.phma@webjockey.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200304222227.03570.phma@webjockey.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-archive-position: 4896 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong From: Jordan DeLong Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 10:27:03PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Tuesday 22 April 2003 21:29, Jordan DeLong wrote: > > But I *don't* prefer things like "ma'arbroda" to "cmanybroda". In > > fact I don't understand the purpose of CV'V rafsi at all. >=20 > What about "bisma'a" versus "bisycmana"? Ahhh I get it; because the consonants may not be a valid pair. Ok so I don't see the point of CV'V rafsi at the *front* of a lujvo. --=20 Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u sei la mark. tuen. cusku --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+pf39DrrilS51AZ8RArB6AKCPn9rg+N7jAQ/QDMYc/tzFA6IhnwCfbchi F54sxA6N9kFsD/uB7UxkFno= =RFXY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--