From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Wed Apr 23 09:21:05 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_5); 23 Apr 2003 16:21:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 7817 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2003 16:21:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 23 Apr 2003 16:21:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2003 16:21:05 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 198MzY-0006MJ-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:21:04 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 198MzD-0006LY-00; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:20:43 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web20511.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.175.150]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 198Mz3-0006LO-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:20:33 -0700 Message-ID: <20030423161308.36244.qmail@web20511.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web20511.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:13:08 PDT Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:13:08 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [lojban] Re: mi'e To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20030423012901.GA47223@allusion.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 4903 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 la djorden cusku di'e > Out of curiousity, why are "r" and "y" kludgey? A nice morphology shouldn't require them: all gismu would have a single combining form, preferrably the gismu itself, and they would all follow the same simple rule for combination instead of the myriad of special cases and special special cases that we have. But that mess is too ingrained in the language to be fixed now. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo http://search.yahoo.com