Subject: [lojban] Re: compass

From: Robin Lee Powell <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 11:22:55 -0700

On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 08:37:39PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 April 2003 20:06, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 08:02:03PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> > > Which is better, {cukyxratci} or {cukci'atci}?
> >
> > Neither; you want cuktai in there somewhere. See the definition of
> > tarmi.
> >
> > Right off the top of my head, how about cuktaizbatci?
> 
> That would be a tool for making ideal circles out of something. A real compass 
> (with a real pen/pencil on one leg and a real pin on the other) draws a 
> cukla, not a cuktai.

You are now arguing with the tarmi definition, not me:

[also pattern; x1 is the mathematical or theoretical ideal form,
while x2 is an object/event manifesting that form; e.g.
circular/circle-shaped (= cukseltai) vs. circle (=cuktai, while
cukla alone is ambiguous);

Also, from cukla:

[normally used for a filled-in circle/disk, but
emphasis on roundness means that the concept may
include 'ring'];

So at the least you should probably be using djine if you insist on
avoiding cuktai.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin.
.i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu
.i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai
http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi