From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Apr 28 14:57:12 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 28 Apr 2003 21:57:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 98499 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2003 20:51:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 Apr 2003 20:51:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Apr 2003 20:51:54 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19AFbN-0001v8-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:51:53 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19AFb6-0001u7-00; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:51:36 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:51:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19AFan-0001t9-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:51:17 -0700 Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:51:17 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb) Message-ID: <20030428205116.GH22216@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20030428194858.18292.qmail@web20506.mail.yahoo.com> <20030428162158.A32091-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030428162158.A32091-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-archive-position: 4988 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 04:36:25PM -0400, Invent Yourself wrote: > As is "jai jai jai na'e jai je'a klesi jai cupra", which was > offered by a random sentence generator, and defended by Jay as > being grammatical, and yet now we're supposed to get our panties > twisted at the fear of "nai nai nai". This is *far* from the only issue. BPFK is consensus-minus-one. I count at *least* 3 people who won't even give this idea the time of day until a complete grammar change proposal is put forth. Either put up or shut up. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi