From ragnarok@pobox.com Mon Apr 28 16:18:50 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: ragnarok@pobox.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 28 Apr 2003 23:18:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 29202 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2003 23:18:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 Apr 2003 23:18:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.intrex.net) (209.42.192.250) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Apr 2003 23:18:49 -0000 Received: from craig [209.42.200.60] by smtp.intrex.net (SMTPD32-7.13) id A6DD17770260; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 19:18:53 -0400 To: "Robin Lee Powell" Cc: Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 19:19:00 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20030428231528.GD20953@digitalkingdom.org> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Declude-Sender: ragnarok@pobox.com [209.42.200.60] From: "Craig" X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=48763382 X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl >> >BPFK is consensus-minus-one. I count at *least* 3 people who >> >won't even give this idea the time of day until a complete >> >grammar change proposal is put forth. >> >> Hence the discussion. BTW, right now you can add a fourth - I'm >> against this change, though I freely admit that my mind isn't made >> up yet. >Did you mean to send this privately? No. There is nothing private about it, and discussion is helped by such things being discussed openly. Therefore, I am CCing this to the jboste.