From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Apr 29 03:39:52 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 29 Apr 2003 10:39:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 73033 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2003 10:39:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Apr 2003 10:39:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2003 10:39:51 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 19ASWc-0002So-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 03:39:50 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 19ASUS-0002S2-00; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 03:37:36 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 03:37:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ca-ontario-cmts7d-79.anhmca.adelphia.net
  ([68.170.46.79] helo=ben ident=mail)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 19ASSE-0002R6-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 03:35:18 -0700
Received: from rizen by ben with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
  id 19ASSA-0008HX-00
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 03:35:14 -0700
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 03:35:14 -0700
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb)
Message-Id: <20030429033514.76205c83.rizen@surreality.us>
In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030428212900.0390d0b0@pop.east.cox.net>
References: <20030428205116.GH22216@digitalkingdom.org>
  <5.2.0.9.0.20030428212900.0390d0b0@pop.east.cox.net>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.11 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="=.qEb))MSve)ad'M"
X-archive-position: 5002
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rizen@surreality.us
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Theodore Reed (bancus) <rizen@surreality.us>
From: Theodore Reed (bancus) <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: rizen@surreality.us
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--=.qEb))MSve)ad'M
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, 28 Apr 2003 21:37:08 -0400
Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:

> >This topic was inspired by Holy Usage, not pure abstract
> >tinkering.
> 
> It was inspired by jboske-ist habits, and people forgetting that the
> byfy is NOT jboske.

Well, to be fair, I'm no a jboskepre, but I have occaisionally written
ka'enai by accident. (Simply not realizing that nai can't go there, even
though it seems like it should.)

Does this justify a language change? Probably not. (Although I must say
that aestetically (probably misspelled that), ka'enai sounds much nicer
than na'eka'e.)

-- 
mu'o mi'e la'o gy. Theodore Reed gy. .e la bancus.
to zoi gy. http://surreality.us/lojban/ gy.
mi nelmau lo notci poi mifra fi la pygypys.

--=.qEb))MSve)ad'M
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+rlViw24JwM4aDNwRAhCZAJ9B5azrQvms0jgvz5x4LqSwEcCm9gCgsh6H
gTlJSgod4QFVzmhW+9qrp2w=
=rrac
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=.qEb))MSve)ad'M--

