From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Apr 29 09:06:23 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 29 Apr 2003 16:06:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 69010 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2003 16:06:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Apr 2003 16:06:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2003 16:06:16 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19AXcV-00083z-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:06:15 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19AXcH-00083U-00; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:06:01 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19AXc3-00083L-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:05:47 -0700 Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.6p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h3TGHbsr006440 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:17:37 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com) Received: (from fracture@localhost) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.6p2/8.12.3/Submit) id h3TGHbZh006439 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:17:37 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:17:36 -0500 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: BPFK phpbb Message-ID: <20030429161736.GA6283@allusion.net> References: <20030429143514.GB5227@allusion.net> <20030429144334.34216.qmail@web20514.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030429144334.34216.qmail@web20514.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-archive-position: 5009 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong From: Jordan DeLong Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 07:43:34AM -0700, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > la djorden cusku di'e > > What would bonai mean? > > mi citka bonai klama broda >=20 > That would be like {mi ke citka klama ke'e nai broda}, > which I suppose should be {mi na'e ke citka klama ke'e broda}. Hah that's funny. Ok how about fi'o nai: mi fi'onai klama le broda cu barda Or xinai: mi xinai pa klama Or even better, nanai: mi nanai klama ni'onai nanai kunai lenai nanmu po'unainai lanai xorxes. zo'unai rinai nanai jinvi lenai du'unai ronai cmavo penainai la'onai zo nai nai cu to'enai xamgu bonai na'enai plukytce .inai .u'inai Explain each of those nai usages? I think it's been pretty well demonstrated that nai is not a word that makes sense to be used anywhere, so I'm done. --=20 Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u sei la mark. tuen. cusku --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+rqWgDrrilS51AZ8RAhTPAJ0QkbaBpH+IF5K7xq6FEhxFnS3yNQCfVzEu uaUrE+bfHUPrEOPPGRDuAZ0= =nTWi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N--