From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Apr 29 09:22:57 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 29 Apr 2003 16:22:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 708 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2003 16:22:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Apr 2003 16:22:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2003 16:22:55 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19AXsd-0008Kn-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:22:55 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19AXsQ-0008KD-00; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:22:42 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:22:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19AXs8-0008Jj-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:22:24 -0700 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:22:24 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: BPFK phpbb Message-ID: <20030429162224.GG20953@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20030429161736.GA6283@allusion.net> <20030429121144.X59548-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030429121144.X59548-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-archive-position: 5012 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 12:14:04PM -0400, Invent Yourself wrote: > On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, Jordan DeLong wrote: > > I think it's been pretty well demonstrated that nai is not a > > word that makes sense to be used anywhere, so I'm done. > > You're dropping the context. Is this a case of the principle that > everything in UI must be able to make sense anywhere? Ummm, duh? That's the whole *point* of UI. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi