From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Tue Apr 29 09:23:16 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 29 Apr 2003 16:23:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 75110 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2003 16:23:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Apr 2003 16:23:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2003 16:23:15 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 19AXsx-0008M5-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:23:15 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 19AXsn-0008LW-00; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:23:05 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web20503.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.226.138])
  by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 19AXsT-0008KJ-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:22:45 -0700
Message-ID: <20030429162242.4036.qmail@web20503.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web20503.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:22:42 PDT
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:22:42 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [lojban] Re: BPFK phpbb
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: <20030429161736.GA6283@allusion.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-archive-position: 5013
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>
Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107
X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000


la djorden cusku di'e

> Ok how about fi'o nai:
> mi fi'onai klama le broda cu barda

Probably {fi'onai klama} = {ka'anai}, whatever that is.

> Or xinai:
> mi xinai pa klama

That could indicate a superindex.

> Or even better, nanai:
> mi nanai klama

Clearly {nanai} = {ja'a}.

> ni'onai nanai kunai lenai nanmu po'unainai lanai xorxes. zo'unai
> rinai nanai jinvi lenai du'unai ronai cmavo penainai la'onai zo nai
> nai cu to'enai xamgu bonai na'enai plukytce .inai .u'inai
> 
> Explain each of those nai usages?

{ni'onai} could be {no'i}, or some other paragraph indicator.
{po'unainai} = {po'u}
{zo'unai} = {zo'u naku} 
{to'enai} and {na'enai} are similar to {je'a}, each with a different 
nuance.

The others have already been discussed (some of them 
are already grammatical). 

> I think it's been pretty well demonstrated that nai is not a word
> that makes sense to be used anywhere, so I'm done.

I think I've shown it does make sense pretty much everywhere.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com