From xod@thestonecutters.net Tue Apr 29 09:29:11 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 29 Apr 2003 16:29:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 88890 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2003 16:29:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Apr 2003 16:29:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2003 16:29:09 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19AXyf-0008Vw-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:29:09 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19AXyV-0008VV-00; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:28:59 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19AXyE-0008UM-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:28:43 -0700 Received: from granite.thestonecutters.net (localhost.thestonecutters.net [127.0.0.1]) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.12.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3TGSrAN061495 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:28:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) with ESMTP id h3TGSrTT061492 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:28:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) X-Authentication-Warning: granite.thestonecutters.net: xod owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:28:53 -0400 (EDT) To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: BPFK phpbb In-Reply-To: <20030429162224.GG20953@digitalkingdom.org> Message-ID: <20030429122726.H59548-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 5015 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Invent Yourself Reply-To: xod@thestonecutters.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=110189215 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 12:14:04PM -0400, Invent Yourself wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, Jordan DeLong wrote: > > > I think it's been pretty well demonstrated that nai is not a > > > word that makes sense to be used anywhere, so I'm done. > > > > You're dropping the context. Is this a case of the principle that > > everything in UI must be able to make sense anywhere? > > Ummm, duh? > > That's the whole *point* of UI. But we've already ascertained that at least one UI, namely kau, has problems in certain places. Go ahead and stick kau all the places that Jorge stuck nai, and see if you can get the same level of meaning he did. -- In an opinion poll conducted in early March by Zogby, 97% of Saudis said they had an unfavorable opinion of the US. "I think that underestimates it," said Awardh Badhi, a political scientist with the Faisal Center for Research and Islamic Studies.