From xod@thestonecutters.net Tue Apr 29 09:41:37 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 29 Apr 2003 16:41:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 43923 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2003 16:41:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Apr 2003 16:41:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2003 16:41:37 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19AYAj-0000K5-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:41:37 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19AYAb-0000Jg-00; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:41:29 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:41:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19AYAL-0000IC-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:41:13 -0700 Received: from granite.thestonecutters.net (localhost.thestonecutters.net [127.0.0.1]) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.12.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3TGfJAN061748 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:41:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) with ESMTP id h3TGfJwR061745 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:41:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) X-Authentication-Warning: granite.thestonecutters.net: xod owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:41:19 -0400 (EDT) To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: BPFK phpbb In-Reply-To: <20030429162224.GG20953@digitalkingdom.org> Message-ID: <20030429123116.C59548-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 5018 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Invent Yourself Reply-To: xod@thestonecutters.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=110189215 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 12:14:04PM -0400, Invent Yourself wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, Jordan DeLong wrote: > > > I think it's been pretty well demonstrated that nai is not a > > > word that makes sense to be used anywhere, so I'm done. > > > > You're dropping the context. Is this a case of the principle that > > everything in UI must be able to make sense anywhere? > > Ummm, duh? > > That's the whole *point* of UI. Let me belabour the point. What does {.i ta'u .i li'o} mean? {.i pau paunai}? What about a bu'onai without a preceding bu'o? How about {.i xu po'o .i li'o}? UI3a and UI7 already seem to have restricted (contextual) meanings. -- In an opinion poll conducted in early March by Zogby, 97% of Saudis said they had an unfavorable opinion of the US. "I think that underestimates it," said Awardh Badhi, a political scientist with the Faisal Center for Research and Islamic Studies.