From cowan@ccil.org Tue Apr 29 16:58:39 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: cowan@mercury.ccil.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 29 Apr 2003 23:58:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 93931 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2003 23:58:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Apr 2003 23:58:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.100) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2003 23:58:38 -0000 Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19AezZ-0007bh-00; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:58:33 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:58:33 -0400 To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb) Message-ID: <20030429235833.GE12348@ccil.org> References: <20030429143319.GA5227@allusion.net> <20030429161151.54722.qmail@web20511.mail.yahoo.com> <20030429162617.GH20953@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030429162617.GH20953@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-eGroups-From: John Cowan From: John Cowan X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=212516 X-Yahoo-Profile: johnwcowan Robin Lee Powell scripsit: > For the same reason you can't say "pu bai klama": LALR(1). If you > haven't gotten used to doing "pu je bai klama", you either are new, > or aren't interested in doing proper formal lojban anyways. Actually "pu bai klama" is fine: it's "pu [ku] bai klama". The rules about tenses are really pretty nugatory: if you violate them, the parser will just insert ku's anyhow. Furthermore, the tense part of the grammar is not at all LALR(1). -- You are a child of the universe no less John Cowan than the trees and all other acyclic http://www.reutershealth.com graphs; you have a right to be here. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan --DeXiderata by Sean McGrath jcowan@reutershealth.com