From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Apr 29 19:48:44 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 30 Apr 2003 02:48:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 78148 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2003 02:48:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Apr 2003 02:48:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2003 02:48:44 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19AheF-0007PN-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:48:43 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Ahe3-0007Ob-00; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:48:31 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:48:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web10903.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.131.39]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Ahdk-0007OE-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:48:12 -0700 Message-ID: <20030430024811.90719.qmail@web10903.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [132.178.214.106] by web10903.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:48:11 PDT Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:48:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb) To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20030429033514.76205c83.rizen@surreality.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 5035 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: eye_onus@yahoo.com Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jon MacLeod From: Jon MacLeod Reply-To: eye_onus@yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out I honestly don't understand what this debate is about, except that it seems that some people want to have ka'enai be valid, as an alternate to using na'eka'e. I also saw na ka'e as a usage somwhere in this thread. Of the three, (assuming all were legal and all were the same meaning), I would be most likely to use na ka'e myself, because both na'eka'e and ka'enai are more cumbersome to say. (Try it, see if you agree. It takes longer to say na'ka'e or ka'enai than it does to say na ka'e.) -Jon ===== "I have a brain, I've just lost my mind." -Ian McLeod -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version 3.1 GSC>$ d+(++) s++:-- a-- C++ UL P L>+++ !E W+(++) N++ o? K- !w--- O- M@ V? PS+++ PE- Y+ PGP- t+ !5 X(+) R+ !tv-- b+++ DI+ D+ G e* h* r-(%) y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com