From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Apr 29 20:17:52 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 30 Apr 2003 03:17:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 96502 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2003 03:17:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Apr 2003 03:17:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2003 03:17:52 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 19Ai6R-0008Hy-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:17:51 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 19Ai65-0008HA-00; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:17:30 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 19Ai5l-0008Gm-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:17:09 -0700
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.6p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h3U3T0sr010824
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:29:00 -0500 (CDT)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.6p2/8.12.3/Submit) id h3U3T0ql010823
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:29:00 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:29:00 -0500
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb)
Message-ID: <20030430032900.GA10708@allusion.net>
References: <20030429143319.GA5227@allusion.net> <20030429161151.54722.qmail@web20511.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J/dobhs11T7y2rNN"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030429161151.54722.qmail@web20511.mail.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-archive-position: 5038
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--J/dobhs11T7y2rNN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 09:11:51AM -0700, Jorge Llambmas wrote:
>=20
> --- Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 03:35:14AM -0700, Theodore Reed wrote:
> > > Well, to be fair, I'm no a jboskepre, but I have occaisionally writte=
n
> > > ka'enai by accident. (Simply not realizing that nai can't go there, e=
ven
> > > though it seems like it should.)
> >=20
> > It only seems like it should because you mislearned CAhA. CAhA are
> > not analagous to PU and FAhA; check your BNF.
>=20
> They seem analogous to me:
>=20
> simple-tense-modal =3D [NAhE] [SE] BAI [NAI] [KI]
> | [NAhE] (time [space]| space [time]) & CAhA [KI]
> | KI
> | CUhE=20
>=20
> PU is the nucleus of 'time' and FAhA of 'space'. So BAI, PU, FAhA,
> CAhA, KI, CUhE and others can all function as simple-tense-modal,
[...]

Err, but if you look at that rule there, they aren't analagous.

You can't say mi ne'i ka'e pu ca'a klama. Any given tense ends
with the modal aspect (or the ki) and you need to join them with a
connective like je.

This makes perfect sense if you think about it.

I think you mentioned {mi pu na'eka'e broda}. This doesn't make
sense either, since either the whole tense should be negated or
not. That sentence could either mean {puku mi na'eka'e broda} or
{mi na'e pu ka'e broda}. It could've been allowed if one of those
meanings were required, I suppose, but it's not obvious which it
should be, and so I don't see what allowing it gets you (I suppose
that you could argue that if it has the puku meaning it saves you
a syllable, though).

(And I think robin's wrong that this is required for LALR(1)).

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--J/dobhs11T7y2rNN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD4DBQE+r0L7DrrilS51AZ8RAqNwAJit/pAY+tK0l6HjBPA0fM8i4imcAKDMlh6U
HyB60wDVDJwbV9JtDwE4eQ==
=WJql
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--J/dobhs11T7y2rNN--

