From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Apr 29 20:26:26 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 30 Apr 2003 03:26:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 91765 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2003 03:26:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Apr 2003 03:26:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2003 03:26:26 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19AiEj-00007s-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:26:25 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19AiEX-00005z-00; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:26:13 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:26:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19AiEC-00005Q-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:25:52 -0700 Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.6p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h3U3bgsr011129 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:37:42 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com) Received: (from fracture@localhost) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.6p2/8.12.3/Submit) id h3U3bgdm011128 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:37:42 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:37:42 -0500 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: BPFK phpbb Message-ID: <20030430033742.GD10708@allusion.net> References: <20030429161736.GA6283@allusion.net> <20030429162242.4036.qmail@web20503.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2iBwrppp/7QCDedR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030429162242.4036.qmail@web20503.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-archive-position: 5041 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong From: Jordan DeLong Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out --2iBwrppp/7QCDedR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 09:22:42AM -0700, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > la djorden cusku di'e [...] > > Explain each of those nai usages? [...] > {zo'unai} =3D {zo'u naku}=20 This contradicts your earlier view about what nai after a terminator means. [...] > > I think it's been pretty well demonstrated that nai is not a word > > that makes sense to be used anywhere, so I'm done. >=20 > I think I've shown it does make sense pretty much everywhere. All you've shown is that you are creative enough to invent contrived meanings for pretty much anything. (And ya gotta admit; some of them were pretty bad (your answer to bonai for example)). --=20 Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u sei la mark. tuen. cusku --2iBwrppp/7QCDedR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+r0UGDrrilS51AZ8RAs4FAKCacoY+LRnnDBrSHgrQsc6Tn5YYWQCfUeJp /3lqnEwRADfNr3TGVGPcZuA= =bukI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2iBwrppp/7QCDedR--