From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Apr 29 20:38:42 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 30 Apr 2003 03:38:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 21448 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2003 03:38:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Apr 2003 03:38:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2003 03:38:42 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19AiQb-0000Pa-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:38:41 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19AiQJ-0000Or-00; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:38:23 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:38:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19AiPr-0000NI-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:37:56 -0700 Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.6p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h3U3nmsr011289 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:49:48 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com) Received: (from fracture@localhost) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.6p2/8.12.3/Submit) id h3U3nhxE011286 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:49:43 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:49:43 -0500 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: BPFK: Salvo 2 (list naziing) Message-ID: <20030430034943.GE10708@allusion.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lteA1dqeVaWQ9QQl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-archive-position: 5042 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong From: Jordan DeLong Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out --lteA1dqeVaWQ9QQl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 12:14:45PM +1000, Nick Nicholas wrote: > Is the proper venue for technical discussion of Lojban the main lojban li= st? >=20 > No. >=20 > Then why the hell is this list being flooded with technical=20 > discussion of Lojban? That is *why* jboske was created. And jboske=20 > was not created exclusively for tinkering discussions. Anyone who=20 > claims so is lying. Anyone who wants to discuss technical details of=20 > Lojban (of which this clearly is an instance), but refuses to read=20 > jboske and wants to use this list instead, is being ornery. Well. I don't actually *know* why jboske was created. But it is certainly true that a lot of what could be called "tinkering discussions" take place there (And just posted a "screw the BNF" message a day or two ago, for example). But that's nonimportant; I agree that it is better to seperate open-ended technical discussion from the main list, and that's what jboske has become primarily for, now. [...] > Meanwhile, if you want to harangue each other about whether UI=3DNAI is=20 > a good thing or not, before the formal presentation on phpbb, then=20 > take it to jboske. FFS. [...] Agreed. Too bad I didn't read your message before sending replies. Future replies from me will go to jboske. --=20 Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u sei la mark. tuen. cusku --lteA1dqeVaWQ9QQl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+r0fXDrrilS51AZ8RAsq9AJsGNYjuTSg2+6uhFFzADna7RlYsswCdEKZh xadxO0ld5hiZX8+eQnriObs= =3MVo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lteA1dqeVaWQ9QQl--