From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Apr 30 07:35:04 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 30 Apr 2003 14:35:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 95499 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2003 14:35:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Apr 2003 14:35:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2003 14:35:03 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19Asfn-0004ty-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 07:35:03 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Asfc-0004t1-00; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 07:34:52 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 30 Apr 2003 07:34:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postal.seas.wustl.edu ([128.252.145.2]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19AsfI-0004ru-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 07:34:32 -0700 Received: from clarion.cec.wustl.edu (clarion.cec.wustl.edu [128.252.21.3]) by postal.seas.wustl.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3UEiUg28160 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:44:30 -0500 Received: from localhost (adam@localhost) by clarion.cec.wustl.edu (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h3UEYTgp019603 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:34:29 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: clarion.cec.wustl.edu: adam owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:34:28 -0500 (CDT) To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: BPFK phpbb In-Reply-To: <20030430135144.1503.qmail@web20506.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: References: <20030430135144.1503.qmail@web20506.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Status: No, -3.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Report: SPAM: ---- Start SpamAssassin results SPAM: -3.70 hits, 5 required; SPAM: * -0.8 -- Found a In-Reply-To header SPAM: * -0.6 -- Message-Id indicates a non-spam MUA (Pine) SPAM: * -0.5 -- Has a valid-looking References header SPAM: * -0.2 -- Found a X-Authentication-Warning header SPAM: * -1.6 -- BODY: Contains what looks like an email attribution SPAM: * 0.8 -- BODY: Spam phrases score is 00 to 01 (low) SPAM: * -0.8 -- BODY: Contains what looks like a quoted email text SPAM: SPAM: ---- End of SpamAssassin results X-archive-position: 5051 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: adam@pubcrawler.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: "Adam D. Lopresto" From: "Adam D. Lopresto" Reply-To: adam@pubcrawler.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Wed, 30 Apr 2003, Jorge Llambías wrote: > > la djan cusku di'e > > > mi senpi lo du'u dokau klama le zarci > > I am doubtful whether you went to the store. > > Which can also be: > > mi senpi lo du'u doxukau klama le zarci > > In general, when {kau} does not follow a question word it is > a shorthand for {xukau}. Hmmm, I'd take { mi senpi lo du'u dokau klama le zarci } to mean "I am doubtful that it was you (as opposed to someone else) who went to the store", different from {doxukau} (whether or not it was you). Am I misinterpretting? -- Adam Lopresto http://cec.wustl.edu/~adam/ A recent study has found that concentrating on difficult off-screen objects, such as the faces of loved ones, causes eye strain in computer scientists. Researchers into the phenomenon cite the added concentration needed to "make sense" of such unnatural three dimensional objects ...