From xod@thestonecutters.net Wed Apr 30 12:42:00 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 30 Apr 2003 19:42:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 38624 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2003 19:41:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Apr 2003 19:41:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2003 19:41:59 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 19AxSp-0003yT-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:41:59 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 19AxSd-0003y7-00; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:41:47 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 19AxSK-0003xY-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:41:28 -0700
Received: from granite.thestonecutters.net (localhost.thestonecutters.net [127.0.0.1])
  by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.12.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3UJfWAN095487
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:41:32 -0400 (EDT)
  (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net)
Received: from localhost (xod@localhost)
  by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) with ESMTP id h3UJfWaE095484
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:41:32 -0400 (EDT)
  (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net)
X-Authentication-Warning: granite.thestonecutters.net: xod owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:41:32 -0400 (EDT)
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Lujvo frequency list
In-Reply-To: <20030430192741.82960.qmail@web20511.mail.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <20030430153247.L85912-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
X-archive-position: 5064
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
Reply-To: xod@thestonecutters.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=110189215
X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple

On Wed, 30 Apr 2003, Jorge Llambías wrote:

>
> la camgusmis cusku di'e
>
> > > skudji (mean to say, from IRC) - 41
> >
> > That's odd, since I for one consistently use djisku, on the grounds
> > that the appropriate tanru is djica cusku, as in "xu do djica cusku
> > lu mi na klama li'u".
>
> {djica cusku} is closer to "willingly say".
>
> If {do pu djica cusku lu mi na klama li'u}, is it true that
> {do pu cusku lu mi na klama li'u}? Is {djica cusku} a type of {cusku}?
> Because usually {skudji} is used with something meant to be said but
> not actually said. It comes from {x1 djica le nu [da'i] x1 cusku x2},
> it does not claim x1 cusku x2.
>
> Of course, {djisku} need not claim {cusku} either, it's a new word,
> but I would not call {djica cusku} the appropriate tanru.



pe'i zo basti zmadu zo djica le ka srana .i le si'o djica .ai le mu'e ba
cusku kei ka'e smuni lu djica le nu cusku li'u .i ku'i zo skudji srana le
si'o djica .uonai le za'i da poi ca selsku cu basti de poi pu selsku



-- 
Neoconservatism in the realm of foreign policy is merely
Trotskyism-turned-inside-out: a militant internationalism fueled by U.S.
taxpayer dollars and backed up by the mightiest military the world has
ever seen.






