From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Wed Apr 30 14:32:00 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 30 Apr 2003 21:31:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 93636 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2003 19:28:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Apr 2003 19:28:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2003 19:28:07 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19AxFP-0003sR-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:28:07 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19AxFE-0003s8-00; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:27:56 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:27:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web20511.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.175.150]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19AxF0-0003ru-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:27:42 -0700 Message-ID: <20030430192741.82960.qmail@web20511.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web20511.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:27:41 PDT Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:27:41 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [lojban] Re: Lujvo frequency list To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20030430164114.GT20953@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 5063 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 la camgusmis cusku di'e > > skudji (mean to say, from IRC) - 41 > > That's odd, since I for one consistently use djisku, on the grounds > that the appropriate tanru is djica cusku, as in "xu do djica cusku > lu mi na klama li'u". {djica cusku} is closer to "willingly say". If {do pu djica cusku lu mi na klama li'u}, is it true that {do pu cusku lu mi na klama li'u}? Is {djica cusku} a type of {cusku}? Because usually {skudji} is used with something meant to be said but not actually said. It comes from {x1 djica le nu [da'i] x1 cusku x2}, it does not claim x1 cusku x2. Of course, {djisku} need not claim {cusku} either, it's a new word, but I would not call {djica cusku} the appropriate tanru. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com