From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon May 05 08:52:24 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 5 May 2003 15:52:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 11487 invoked from network); 5 May 2003 15:52:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 May 2003 15:52:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 May 2003 15:52:24 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 19CiGN-0000xb-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 05 May 2003 08:52:23 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 19CiG5-0000xI-00; Mon, 05 May 2003 08:52:05 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 05 May 2003 08:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 19CiFr-0000x9-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 05 May 2003 08:51:51 -0700
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h45G1o67068449
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 5 May 2003 11:01:50 -0500 (CDT)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id h45G1okc068448
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 5 May 2003 11:01:50 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 11:01:50 -0500
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: required commas (was Re: Stress of cmene)
Message-ID: <20030505160150.GA68381@allusion.net>
References: <200305040821.28114.phma@webjockey.net> <20030504160442.GA73599@allusion.net> <3EB5402C.3060607@free.fr> <200305050958.18927.phma@webjockey.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200305050958.18927.phma@webjockey.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-archive-position: 5128
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 09:58:18AM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Sunday 04 May 2003 12:30, Lionel Vidal wrote:
> > Well, my mistake. You are quite right of course, and although I was les=
s
> > than half serious in my first paragraph, I should not have drawn
> > non-sensical conclusions for the pleasure of a bad joke. (And anyway
> > I did realise too late it was non-sensical).
> >
> > I still think my proposals for default stress on cmene is a good
> > solution though.
> > And I still think that two cmenes should not be considered different if
> > they differ
> > only in stress.
>=20
> I see two possibilities:
> 1. Two cmene differing only in stress are the same. Commas are ignored.
> 2. Two cmene differing only in stress are different. Commas are ignored u=
nless=20
> they change the syllabication of vowels.
> The problem with 2 is that syllabication of vowels can be changed without=
=20
> changing the sound of the word, e.g. {malau,is} vs. {mala,uis}.

malau,is. is different from mala,uis. if you pronounce it correctly.

> As to the ,=3D' rule, I think it's a mistake. Apostrophes are always=20
> distinctive, whereas commas are not. {malauis} =3D {malau,is} <> {malau'i=
s}.

I've prooved commas must be distinctive. ,=3D' is a more sane rule
than the commas-don't-matter rule; it takes precedence.

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+toruDrrilS51AZ8RAm2YAJ9wPRyYQGHB/BfepKcFPYgX6aHfqQCfcmWa
rDIBOhwRK/xdcD2DjwdWNOI=
=VrU3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X--

From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon May 05 08:52:24 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 5 May 2003 15:52:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 11487 invoked from network); 5 May 2003 15:52:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 May 2003 15:52:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 May 2003 15:52:24 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 19CiGN-0000xb-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 05 May 2003 08:52:23 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 19CiG5-0000xI-00; Mon, 05 May 2003 08:52:05 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 05 May 2003 08:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 19CiFr-0000x9-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 05 May 2003 08:51:51 -0700
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h45G1o67068449
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 5 May 2003 11:01:50 -0500 (CDT)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id h45G1okc068448
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 5 May 2003 11:01:50 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 11:01:50 -0500
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: required commas (was Re: Stress of cmene)
Message-ID: <20030505160150.GA68381@allusion.net>
References: <200305040821.28114.phma@webjockey.net> <20030504160442.GA73599@allusion.net> <3EB5402C.3060607@free.fr> <200305050958.18927.phma@webjockey.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200305050958.18927.phma@webjockey.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-archive-position: 5128
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 09:58:18AM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Sunday 04 May 2003 12:30, Lionel Vidal wrote:
> > Well, my mistake. You are quite right of course, and although I was les=
s
> > than half serious in my first paragraph, I should not have drawn
> > non-sensical conclusions for the pleasure of a bad joke. (And anyway
> > I did realise too late it was non-sensical).
> >
> > I still think my proposals for default stress on cmene is a good
> > solution though.
> > And I still think that two cmenes should not be considered different if
> > they differ
> > only in stress.
>=20
> I see two possibilities:
> 1. Two cmene differing only in stress are the same. Commas are ignored.
> 2. Two cmene differing only in stress are different. Commas are ignored u=
nless=20
> they change the syllabication of vowels.
> The problem with 2 is that syllabication of vowels can be changed without=
=20
> changing the sound of the word, e.g. {malau,is} vs. {mala,uis}.

malau,is. is different from mala,uis. if you pronounce it correctly.

> As to the ,=3D' rule, I think it's a mistake. Apostrophes are always=20
> distinctive, whereas commas are not. {malauis} =3D {malau,is} <> {malau'i=
s}.

I've prooved commas must be distinctive. ,=3D' is a more sane rule
than the commas-don't-matter rule; it takes precedence.

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+toruDrrilS51AZ8RAm2YAJ9wPRyYQGHB/BfepKcFPYgX6aHfqQCfcmWa
rDIBOhwRK/xdcD2DjwdWNOI=
=VrU3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X--

