From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue May 06 19:01:24 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 7 May 2003 02:01:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 89863 invoked from network); 7 May 2003 02:01:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 May 2003 02:01:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 May 2003 02:01:13 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 19DEF7-0007px-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 06 May 2003 19:01:13 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 19DEEW-0007pb-00; Tue, 06 May 2003 19:00:37 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 06 May 2003 19:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miranda.org ([209.58.150.153] ident=qmailr)
  by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 19DEEL-0007pS-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 06 May 2003 19:00:26 -0700
Received: (qmail 29100 invoked by uid 534); 7 May 2003 02:00:17 -0000
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 20:00:17 -0600
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Some ideas/questions (long)
Message-ID: <20030507020017.GS15743@miranda.org>
References: <20030507013859.GQ15743@miranda.org> <20030506214650.L90081-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030506214650.L90081-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>
Accept-Language: art-lojban, en
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-archive-position: 5177
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jkominek@miranda.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jay F Kominek <jkominek@miranda.org>
From: Jay F Kominek <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: jkominek@miranda.org
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 09:48:41PM -0400, Invent Yourself wrote:
> > I will vote against anything which tries to shrink the gismu to some sort
> > of minimal set.
> 
> You say this as if any significant number might disagree with you.

I don't see any reason not to state the obvious, especially when it
apparently isn't obvious to these people who continue to act as though
discussing this is productive. Thanks for prolonging it.

-- 
Jay Kominek <jkominek@miranda.org>
The wheels are spinning,
but the hamster is dead.




From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue May 06 19:01:24 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 7 May 2003 02:01:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 89863 invoked from network); 7 May 2003 02:01:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 May 2003 02:01:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 May 2003 02:01:13 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 19DEF7-0007px-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 06 May 2003 19:01:13 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 19DEEW-0007pb-00; Tue, 06 May 2003 19:00:37 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 06 May 2003 19:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miranda.org ([209.58.150.153] ident=qmailr)
  by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 19DEEL-0007pS-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 06 May 2003 19:00:26 -0700
Received: (qmail 29100 invoked by uid 534); 7 May 2003 02:00:17 -0000
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 20:00:17 -0600
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Some ideas/questions (long)
Message-ID: <20030507020017.GS15743@miranda.org>
References: <20030507013859.GQ15743@miranda.org> <20030506214650.L90081-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030506214650.L90081-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>
Accept-Language: art-lojban, en
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-archive-position: 5177
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jkominek@miranda.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jay F Kominek <jkominek@miranda.org>
From: Jay F Kominek <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: jkominek@miranda.org
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 09:48:41PM -0400, Invent Yourself wrote:
> > I will vote against anything which tries to shrink the gismu to some sort
> > of minimal set.
> 
> You say this as if any significant number might disagree with you.

I don't see any reason not to state the obvious, especially when it
apparently isn't obvious to these people who continue to act as though
discussing this is productive. Thanks for prolonging it.

-- 
Jay Kominek <jkominek@miranda.org>
The wheels are spinning,
but the hamster is dead.




