Subject: Re: [lojban] RECORD:name abstractions

From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:55:08 -0400

At 12:16 PM 04/12/2000 -0400, [email-masked] wrote:
>The property of being -- or being significantly related to n is mela n-- and
>so reference to that involve leka mela n or so.

Can you rephrase this (and include it in a new form of the RECORD)? I 
can't parse the English, hitting a wall either at "reference" or "involve", 
and the hyphen positions then cause me to double take back as "is".

I believe that "mela n" should not include "being significantly related to 
n" given a prior ruling on what "me" means. This was our one major change 
to agree with a TLI correction from their logician.

lojbab
----
lojbab [email-masked]
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org (newly updated!)