From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Sat Apr 15 17:19:35 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23020 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2000 00:19:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 16 Apr 2000 00:19:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO relay3-gui.server.ntli.net) (194.168.4.200) by mta1 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2000 00:19:34 -0000 Received: from m13-mp1-cvx1c.gui.ntl.com ([62.252.12.13] helo=andrew) by relay3-gui.server.ntli.net with smtp (Exim 3.03 #2) id 12gcex-0000te-00 for lojban@onelist.com; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 01:11:32 +0100 To: Subject: dyadically (was: RE: [lojban] Bringing it about that ) Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 01:19:47 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-eGroups-From: "And Rosta" From: "And Rosta" Iain Alexander: > On 13 Apr 00, at 15:45, Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) wrote: > > two-placedly (there ought to be a good ten-dollar Latinate word for that! > > diadically pe'i _dyadically_ (which indeed is an orthodox word for 2-placedly). --And.