From jjllambias@hotmail.com Wed Apr 19 07:29:28 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28305 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2000 14:29:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 19 Apr 2000 14:29:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.190) by mta1 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2000 14:29:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 18539 invoked by uid 0); 19 Apr 2000 14:29:28 -0000 Message-ID: <20000419142928.18538.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 12.128.6.202 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Wed, 19 Apr 2000 07:29:27 PDT X-Originating-IP: [12.128.6.202] To: lojban@onelist.com Subject: Re: [lojban] RECORD: some negation details Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 07:29:27 PDT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-eGroups-From: "Jorge Llambias" From: "Jorge Llambias" la pycyn cusku di'e >na'e attaches to the immediately following component of a selbri (na'e ke >is >needed, to attach to the whole selbri, if it is complex). The place >structure of na'e broda is the same as that of broda, so na'e and se can be >interchanged when not part of a tanru. Even when part of a tanru they can be interchanged, because se also attaches to the immediately following component of a selbri. Since na'e and se attach to the same thing, and their functions are transparent to each other, their order does not matter. {na'e se broda brode} is the same as {se na'e broda brode}. co'o mi'e xorxes ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com