From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Fri Apr 21 02:46:25 2000
Return-Path: <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
Received: (qmail 12138 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2000 09:46:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 21 Apr 2000 09:46:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO relay3-gui.server.ntli.net) (194.168.4.200) by mta1 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2000 09:46:23 -0000
Received: from m113-mp1-cvx1c.gui.ntl.com ([62.252.12.113] helo=andrew) by relay3-gui.server.ntli.net with smtp (Exim 3.03 #2) id 12iZt9-0002Fw-00 for lojban@onelist.com; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 10:38:16 +0100
To: <lojban@egroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] RECORD: abstractions from names. 
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 10:46:33 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMEEBGCIAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <db.2e34382.26298a33@aol.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>

pc:
> Being John Malkovitch is, presumably, le zu'u la djan malkovitc.

I don't have any reference materials handy, but that doesn't look right.

My effort, from feeble memory:

le zu'u ce'u me la djan malkovitc

The ce'u is grammatical, I think. I'm less sure whether the meaning of the
whole is appropriate, though.

[My apologies if this was discussed to death during my period of involuntary
absence from the list, but pc's message is the only one of the topic I've
seen.]

--And.

