From xod@sixgirls.org Fri Apr 21 03:44:33 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18688 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2000 10:44:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 21 Apr 2000 10:44:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO q8.egroups.com) (10.1.2.31) by mta1 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2000 10:44:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 21188 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2000 10:44:33 -0000 Received: from ip72.207-252-3.vastnet.net (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (207.252.3.72) by mx3.egroups.com with SMTP; 21 Apr 2000 10:44:33 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA19480 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 06:44:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 06:44:31 -0400 (EDT) To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: RE: [lojban] RECORD: abstractions from names. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, And Rosta wrote: > pc: > > Being John Malkovitch is, presumably, le zu'u la djan malkovitc. > > I don't have any reference materials handy, but that doesn't look right. > > My effort, from feeble memory: > > le zu'u ce'u me la djan malkovitc > > The ce'u is grammatical, I think. I'm less sure whether the meaning of the > whole is appropriate, though. ki'a (confusion!) zu'u [ UI3 ] on the one hand discursive: on the one hand - on the other hand (cf. karbi, frica. dukti) ru'a do'o nitcu zo za'i (perhaps you meant "za'i"). > > [My apologies if this was discussed to death during my period of involuntary > absence from the list, but pc's message is the only one of the topic I've > seen.] > > --And. na nabmi mi ki'u le du'u mi na tcidu ra (no problem, I wasn't reading that thread anyway.) ----- In the Linux world, all of the major distributions have turned into companies. How much revenue would Red Hat generate if their product was flawless? How much support would they sell?