From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Sat Apr 22 01:00:03 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17629 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2000 08:00:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 22 Apr 2000 08:00:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO qg.egroups.com) (10.1.2.27) by mta1 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2000 08:00:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 1161 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2000 08:00:02 -0000 Received: from relay3-gui.server.ntli.net (194.168.4.200) by qg.egroups.com with SMTP; 22 Apr 2000 08:00:02 -0000 Received: from m65-mp1-cvx1c.gui.ntl.com ([62.252.12.65] helo=andrew) by relay3-gui.server.ntli.net with smtp (Exim 3.03 #2) id 12iuhm-0003v9-00 for lojban@egroups.com; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 08:51:54 +0100 To: Subject: RE: [lojban] RECORD: abstractions from names. Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2000 09:00:12 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 From: "And Rosta" xod: > On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, And Rosta wrote: > > > pc: > > > Being John Malkovitch is, presumably, le zu'u la djan malkovitc. > > > > I don't have any reference materials handy, but that doesn't look right. > > > > My effort, from feeble memory: > > > > le zu'u ce'u me la djan malkovitc > > > > The ce'u is grammatical, I think. I'm less sure whether the meaning of the > > whole is appropriate, though. > > > > ki'a (confusion!) > > zu'u [ UI3 ] on the one hand > discursive: on the one hand - on the other hand (cf. karbi, > frica. dukti) > > > ru'a do'o nitcu zo za'i > (perhaps you meant "za'i"). [a curious but not inapt use of "nitcu"] I mean the NU for activity -- or rather, that's what I assumed pc was using. I don't have even a ma'oste on my PC here, so can't check. > > > > > > > [My apologies if this was discussed to death during my period of involuntary > > absence from the list, but pc's message is the only one of the topic I've > > seen.] > > > > --And. > > > na nabmi mi ki'u le du'u mi na tcidu ra > (no problem, I wasn't reading that thread anyway.) > > ----- > In the Linux world, all of the major distributions have turned into > companies. How much revenue would Red Hat generate if their product > was flawless? How much support would they sell? > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Enjoy the award-winning journalism of The New York Times with > convenient home delivery. And for a limited time, get 50% off for the > first 8 weeks by subscribing. Pay by credit card and receive an > additional 4 weeks at this low introductory rate. > http://click.egroups.com/1/3102/2/_/17627/_/956313873/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com >