From pycyn@aol.com Sat Apr 22 06:37:48 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4635 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2000 13:37:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 22 Apr 2000 13:37:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO qh.egroups.com) (10.1.2.28) by mta2 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2000 13:37:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 13097 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2000 13:37:48 -0000 Received: from imo21.mx.aol.com (152.163.225.65) by qh.egroups.com with SMTP; 22 Apr 2000 13:37:48 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo21.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v25.3.) id a.a.2a10a19 (3889) for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 09:37:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2000 09:37:44 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] RECORD: abstractions from names. To: lojban@egroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows sub 33 From: pycyn@aol.com ZUhO dammit (and hunt-and-peck is supposed to be more accurate, if slower, than touch!) See the movie: it is clearly an activity, not a state, that is involved (cf. English use of continuatives of statives for pretending) pc