From grey.havens@earthling.net Mon May 08 15:11:19 2000
Return-Path: <grey.havens@earthling.net>
Received: (qmail 12817 invoked from network); 8 May 2000 22:10:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 8 May 2000 22:10:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO postfix3.free.fr) (212.27.32.22) by mta1 with SMTP; 8 May 2000 22:10:51 -0000
Received: from tam.n (unknown [213.228.59.143]) by postfix3.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DF286D69; Tue, 9 May 2000 00:10:49 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 00:10:25 +0200 (CEST)
X-Sender: elrond@tam.n
To: Taral <taral@taral.net>
Cc: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Logflash
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0005081600030.13711-100000@r149127-2815.dobiecenter.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0005090005350.8826-100000@tam.n>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Elrond <grey.havens@earthling.net>


> > > (I'm planning a version of logflash's algorithm for UNIX. If there are any
> > > suggestions, please feel free to make them.)

> No, I meant I'm doing a complete rewrite from the algorithm statement, in
> C, using ncurses.
> 

Using C is probably a very good idea, using ANSI/POSIX would be
yet even better so that it is very portable at the end (I can help you
with that), and of course make it GPL'ed. ;-)) I also suggest making the
source as modular as possible, so that it is easy to implement an X
interface once the ncurses is done.

I have been willing lately to write the unix version too, you put
it in first, but I'm still willing to help. Mail me directly if you wish
to talk about it.

co'o mi'e rafael






