From taral@taral.net Tue May 09 07:33:39 2000
Return-Path: <taral@taral.net>
Received: (qmail 30838 invoked from network); 9 May 2000 14:33:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 9 May 2000 14:33:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.taral.net) (209.217.149.127) by mta3 with SMTP; 9 May 2000 14:33:39 -0000
Received: by mail.taral.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id E5E8626332; Tue, 9 May 2000 09:33:37 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.taral.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9FEC24B62; Tue, 9 May 2000 09:33:37 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 09:33:37 -0500 (CDT)
X-Sender: taral@r149127-2815.dobiecenter.com
To: Brook Conner <nellardo@concentric.net>
Cc: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: OT - programming logflash Re: [lojban] Logflash
In-Reply-To: <39173ACF.2938AB8D@concentric.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0005090932180.15526-100000@r149127-2815.dobiecenter.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Taral <taral@taral.net>

On Mon, 8 May 2000, Brook Conner wrote:

> Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > >> No, I meant I'm doing a complete rewrite from the algorithm statement, in
> > >> C, using ncurses.
> 
> <programming-language-rant>

I'm seriously thinking of switching either to C++ with STL or to Python. I
don't want to have to handle the problems with lists of words in C. It's
already been done and it's WAY too time-consuming to re-implement.

Since it's for UNIX already, I think I'll go for Python. C++ with STL is
only slightly less annoying than C.

Taral


