From chris@double.co.nz Wed May 10 13:23:19 2000
Return-Path: <chris@double.co.nz>
Received: (qmail 17207 invoked from network); 10 May 2000 20:23:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 10 May 2000 20:23:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.host4u.net) (209.150.128.105) by mta1 with SMTP; 10 May 2000 20:23:18 -0000
Received: from DOUBLE (210-55-118-200.adsl.xtra.co.nz [210.55.118.200]) by demeter.host4u.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA16894 for <lojban@egroups.com>; Wed, 10 May 2000 15:23:06 -0500
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: OT - programming logflash Re: [lojban] Logflash
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0005090932180.15526-100000@r149127-2815.dobiecenter.com>
Date: 11 May 2000 08:24:41 +1200
In-Reply-To: Taral's message of "Tue, 9 May 2000 09:33:37 -0500 (CDT)"
Message-ID: <wk66smm9va.fsf@double.co.nz>
Lines: 23
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070099 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.99) Emacs/20.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Chris Double <chris@double.co.nz>

Taral <taral@taral.net> writes:

> I'm seriously thinking of switching either to C++ with STL or to
> Python. I don't want to have to handle the problems with lists of
> words in C. It's already been done and it's WAY too time-consuming
> to re-implement.

Have you looked at the language Dylan? It provides much of the power
of CLOS/Lisp with an algol-ish syntax and the currently available
implementations are compilers. Gwydion Dylan compiles to 'C' which is
then compiled by the local 'C' compiler. Functional Developer (Windows
product) produces native code. Implementations available for Windows,
Unix, BeOS, etc:

http://www.gwydiondylan.org
http://www.functionalobjects.com

Just trying to save you from C++ :-)

Chris.
-- 
http://www.double.co.nz/lojban



