From broca@fix.no Thu May 11 09:36:01 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11646 invoked from network); 11 May 2000 16:36:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 11 May 2000 16:36:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO qh.egroups.com) (10.1.2.28) by mta2 with SMTP; 11 May 2000 16:36:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 19718 invoked from network); 11 May 2000 16:36:00 -0000 Received: from imv.egroups.com (HELO mv.egroups.com) (10.1.1.41) by iqh.egroups.com with SMTP; 11 May 2000 16:36:00 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: broca@fix.no Received: from [10.1.10.33] by mv.egroups.com with NNFMP; 11 May 2000 17:36:00 -0000 Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 16:35:59 -0000 To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: "da" in conjunction with "na" Message-ID: <8fenhf+9k66@eGroups.com> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 372 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster From: "Arnt-Richard Johansen" What is the correct interpretation of sentences with both "da" and "na"? For instance, does "da na prane prenu" mean "There are no perfect people" (i.e. "(It is not the case that (there is one x so that (x is perfect person)))"), or "There is an imperfect person" (i.e. "(There is one x so that (it is not the case that (x is perfect person)))")? co'o mi'e tsali