From taral@taral.net Thu May 11 09:39:38 2000
Return-Path: <taral@taral.net>
Received: (qmail 6342 invoked from network); 11 May 2000 16:39:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 11 May 2000 16:39:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.taral.net) (209.217.149.127) by mta3 with SMTP; 11 May 2000 16:39:12 -0000
Received: by mail.taral.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2ACB826332; Thu, 11 May 2000 11:39:12 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.taral.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1BB24B62; Thu, 11 May 2000 11:39:12 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 11:39:12 -0500 (CDT)
X-Sender: taral@r149127-2815.dobiecenter.com
To: Arnt-Richard Johansen <broca@fix.no>
Cc: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] "da" in conjunction with "na"
In-Reply-To: <8fenhf+9k66@eGroups.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0005111138370.18965-100000@r149127-2815.dobiecenter.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Taral <taral@taral.net>

On Thu, 11 May 2000, Arnt-Richard Johansen wrote:

> What is the correct interpretation of sentences with both "da" 
> and "na"? For instance, does "da na prane prenu" mean "There are no 
> perfect people"

I think so. If I remember rightly, "na" not's the entire bridi.

Taral