From taral@taral.net Thu May 11 09:39:38 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6342 invoked from network); 11 May 2000 16:39:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 11 May 2000 16:39:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.taral.net) (209.217.149.127) by mta3 with SMTP; 11 May 2000 16:39:12 -0000 Received: by mail.taral.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2ACB826332; Thu, 11 May 2000 11:39:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.taral.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1BB24B62; Thu, 11 May 2000 11:39:12 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 11:39:12 -0500 (CDT) X-Sender: taral@r149127-2815.dobiecenter.com To: Arnt-Richard Johansen Cc: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] "da" in conjunction with "na" In-Reply-To: <8fenhf+9k66@eGroups.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Taral On Thu, 11 May 2000, Arnt-Richard Johansen wrote: > What is the correct interpretation of sentences with both "da" > and "na"? For instance, does "da na prane prenu" mean "There are no > perfect people" I think so. If I remember rightly, "na" not's the entire bridi. Taral