From jjllambias@hotmail.com Fri May 12 10:32:46 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10563 invoked from network); 12 May 2000 17:32:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 12 May 2000 17:32:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO qh.egroups.com) (10.1.2.28) by mta2 with SMTP; 12 May 2000 17:32:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 28205 invoked from network); 12 May 2000 17:32:46 -0000 Received: from c9.egroups.com (10.1.2.66) by iqh.egroups.com with SMTP; 12 May 2000 17:32:46 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: jjllambias@hotmail.com Received: from [10.1.10.126] by c9.egroups.com with NNFMP; 12 May 2000 17:32:45 -0000 Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 17:32:40 -0000 To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] "little-endian", "big-endian" words Message-ID: <8fhf7o+it7l@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 402 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster From: "Jorge Llambias" la taral cusku di'e > > > i xu le trixe be lo selsku cu lidne ji se lidne sy > > > > sy. ty. lidne kuru'a .iku'i .e'u zo crazva zo lidne xagmau > > Neither of these parse, so I have no idea what's being said. {ji} should be {je'i} and {ku} should be {vau}. {sy ty} will parse, but probably the intention was {sy boi ty}. Human parsers are more forgiving than computer ones... co'o mi'e xorxes