From pycyn@aol.com Fri May 12 12:47:37 2000
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
Received: (qmail 26773 invoked from network); 12 May 2000 19:47:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 12 May 2000 19:47:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d07.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.39) by mta3 with SMTP; 12 May 2000 19:47:37 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v26.7.) id a.6.5dee9d8 (3855) for <lojban@egroups.com>; Fri, 12 May 2000 15:47:33 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <6.5dee9d8.264db9d4@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 15:47:32 EDT
Subject: RE: Redherringification
To: lojban@egroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows sub 33
From: pycyn@aol.com

Thanks to Michael for forwarding Rex May's message.
Much as I value Rex May as a participant in things Loglandic and as a 
cartoonist (and the only person to get a Loglan joke into international mass 
media), I have to say that LLG nor TLI (on a safish bet) has any interest in 
such radical deviation from JCB's design. Even if relexification were in the 
cards, which I am sure it is not. Rapprochement, if it comes to anyThing so 
concrete as a common langauge, will be achieved within the framework of what 
already exists.

