From taral@taral.net Sat May 13 14:33:40 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15225 invoked from network); 13 May 2000 21:33:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 13 May 2000 21:33:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.taral.net) (209.217.149.127) by mta3 with SMTP; 13 May 2000 21:33:09 -0000 Received: by mail.taral.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id 4A52726333; Sat, 13 May 2000 16:33:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.taral.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25DD924B62; Sat, 13 May 2000 16:33:08 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 16:33:07 -0500 (CDT) X-Sender: taral@r149127-2815.dobiecenter.com To: "Robert A. McIvor" Cc: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Logflash In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Taral On Fri, 12 May 2000, Robert A. McIvor wrote: > The Loglan equivalent program has always permitted synonyms in > the L->E directions. That one keyword is used for the E->L direction > has never caused any problem that I know of, but requiring to remember > the exact E word was sufficiently annoying that we thought it > important to permit synonyms. The synonyms are also included in a > separate line in the E->L presentation. (This also clarifies for the > user if the E keyword has a secondary meaning, as a large percentage > of the commoner E words do. Well, like I said, all I need is a thesaurus! -- Taral