From pycyn@aol.com Thu May 18 01:54:32 2000
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
Received: (qmail 25745 invoked from network); 18 May 2000 08:54:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 18 May 2000 08:54:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d08.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.40) by mta1 with SMTP; 18 May 2000 08:54:32 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v26.7.) id a.d0.5f200a5 (1758) for <lojban@egroups.com>; Thu, 18 May 2000 04:54:27 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <d0.5f200a5.265509c3@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 04:54:27 EDT
Subject: RECORD: cultural words
To: lojban@egroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41
From: pycyn@aol.com

The CCVVCV format for cultural fu'ivla seems to work and should be used, when 
lujvo
are objectioned to strongly, in favor of pseudo-gismu. Thus, {kraibe} for 
Carribean,
rather than *{krabo}. Replacements ought to be sought for other *-forms that 
have
arisen: xorvo, norgo, talno, turko, loglo, spero -- and probably others 
(admittedly,
nothing immediately suggests itself for any of these that would please a 
native: xro'ato?
tri,uko? ...)

