From grey.havens@earthling.net Thu May 18 13:12:12 2000
Return-Path: <grey.havens@earthling.net>
Received: (qmail 21953 invoked from network); 18 May 2000 20:12:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 18 May 2000 20:12:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO postfix2.free.fr) (212.27.32.74) by mta1 with SMTP; 18 May 2000 20:12:10 -0000
Received: from tam.n (marseille2-1-60-12.dial.proxad.net [212.27.60.12]) by postfix2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9F5740D4 for <lojban@egroups.com>; Thu, 18 May 2000 22:12:08 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 22:12:24 +0200 (CEST)
X-Sender: elrond@tam.n
To: Lojban List <lojban@egroups.com>
Subject: Phonetics
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0005182203530.13681-100000@tam.n>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Elrond <grey.havens@earthling.net>


Hi,
due to a project of mine, I have started working on the lojban
phonetics system more thoroughly. After the first read on consonant
clusters, I just *could not* figure out why only "m" can follow "j" and
"z", and not "n", while both "m" and "n" can follow "c" and "s" (when
speaking about permissible initial consonant pairs, that is).

A clear and self-understanding picture with comments on the problem
can be found at
http://grey.havens.free.fr/lojban/initial_consonant_pairs.html

I would really appreciate a detailed explanation on this.
(is there any archives on the morphological history of lojban ?)

Thanks
raph



