From pycyn@aol.com Tue May 23 19:41:42 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25875 invoked from network); 24 May 2000 02:41:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 24 May 2000 02:41:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo13.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.3) by mta3 with SMTP; 24 May 2000 02:41:41 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo13.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.9.) id a.24.561dcf5 (4585) for ; Tue, 23 May 2000 22:41:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <24.561dcf5.265c9b5b@aol.com> Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 22:41:31 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] le ga'irfanta To: LOJBAN@egroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41 From: pycyn@aol.com In a message dated 00-05-23 16:26:52 EDT, you write: << la pycyn cusku di'e >It works for me: "the date of the end of the freeze is the result of adding >at least five years to the date of the completion of publication of ther >books" But don't ask me to lb it. le ga'irfanta fanmo detri cu sumji lo nanca be li su'omu le detri be le nu lei cukta mu'o selpaprybi'o >> Thanks! Oops! It was an illegitimate lujvo all along. Ah, well, the message was more important than its expression? I still have my worries about , but this is pretty close to regular mathematical addition anyhow -- and seems to cover the a- (even anti-)symmetric cases. Couldn't the second date given be just that of the publication of the first book, since is implicitly quantified ? The ruling involved wants (or use ).