From jjllambias@hotmail.com Thu May 25 14:22:10 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13811 invoked from network); 25 May 2000 21:22:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 25 May 2000 21:22:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.45) by mta3 with SMTP; 25 May 2000 21:22:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 25767 invoked by uid 0); 25 May 2000 21:22:10 -0000 Message-ID: <20000525212210.25766.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 200.42.154.207 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Thu, 25 May 2000 14:22:09 PDT X-Originating-IP: [200.42.154.207] To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] RECORD: morphology Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 14:22:09 PDT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed From: "Jorge Llambias" la djan cusku di'e >So I thought too. But "Iglu ZDAni" cannot be analyzed as "I gluZDAni", >because a stressed cmavo must be separated from a following brivla >by pause, thus: "I. gluZDAni". > >Nevertheless I seem to remember that there is a more complex case that >fails. You're right! Then it never fails. We know that it starts at the I, because it has to be preceded by a pause and since it is two syllables it must be stressed, and so the second syllable can never be part of anything else. I can't see how it could fail. co'o mi'e xorxes ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com