Subject: Re: [lojban] coi rodo - mi'e .aulun.

From: "Jorge Llambias" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 12:12:36 PDT

la ivAn cusku di'e

>All things considered, I'd go for {tcuan,ts} and {xuei,ts}.

Sounds good to me.

>{do na finpe} vs {do na du mi} does not quite get across the
>parallelism of the original, which had, I take it, something
>like _ni3 bu4shi4 yu2_ vs _ni3 bu4shi4 wo3_. There should
>be a way of making the two utterances more similar. ...

{do na me mi} maybe. The lack of parallelism makes it more
clear what is the flaw in the argument, which the formal
parallelism of the Chinese expression perhaps helps to cloud.

co'o mi'e xorxes

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com