From BestATN@aol.com Sun May 28 17:33:19 2000
Return-Path: <BestATN@aol.com>
Received: (qmail 2079 invoked from network); 29 May 2000 00:33:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 29 May 2000 00:33:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d02.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.34) by mta3 with SMTP; 29 May 2000 00:33:18 -0000
Received: from BestATN@aol.com by imo-d02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.9.) id a.e2.50141a3 (4424) for <lojban@egroups.com>; Sun, 28 May 2000 20:33:16 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <e2.50141a3.266314cb@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 28 May 2000 20:33:15 EDT
Subject: gismu recognizability
To: lojban@egroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 105
From: BestATN@aol.com

I have decided, having gone through the LogFlash gismu list in the 
Lojban-English direction, that the objective of the method used to create 
gismu is not to make it easier for most people to recognize them, but rather 
to make it equally difficult for most people to recognize them. the aim of 
cultural neutrality is furthered either way.
Steven Lytle