From pycyn@aol.com Fri Jun 02 16:05:32 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14063 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2000 23:05:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 2 Jun 2000 23:05:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r12.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.66) by mta2 with SMTP; 2 Jun 2000 23:05:31 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r12.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.9.) id a.15.49efd9c (3952) for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 19:05:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <15.49efd9c.266997a6@aol.com> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 19:05:10 EDT Subject: Help: sexual words To: lojban@egroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41 From: pycyn@aol.com Going over this thread, I see that we need either a decree from those on high (who dat?) or a recognition of usage or something to sort out the various uses of gletu and cinse -- and maybe pendo and prami -- to deal with the various ways in which people are sexual/gendered/ socialized and express same. What are the limits of gletu? Of cinse (without too much falling back on "under standards" or whatever)? Where do the various roles of genetics, phenotype, acculturation fit in? By the way, more words might very well help with these questions.