From pycyn@aol.com Tue Jun 06 19:31:48 2000
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
Received: (qmail 23052 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2000 02:21:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by 10.1.10.39 with QMQP; 7 Jun 2000 02:21:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo16.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.6) by mta1 with SMTP; 7 Jun 2000 02:21:43 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo16.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.9.) id a.66.458c342 (4013) for <lojban@egroups.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 22:21:34 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <66.458c342.266f0bac@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 22:21:32 EDT
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Robin on cmene
To: lojban@egroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41
From: pycyn@aol.com

In a message dated 00-06-06 19:24:06 EDT, robin writes:

<< So a rose by any other name would not smell so sweet! >>
Not to the rose, certainly!

<<I would say that whatever someone's cmene is, that's their name, 
regardless of phonology (I, for instance, get irritated by people telling me 
my name should be
"rabin."!). >>
No, no: /rabn/ ;)
But I'm not sure about the first point. Whatever they pick is what is right 
(I would agree) or whatever gets picked is what is right (not if I don't like 
it)?