Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Bootlegger

From: Pierre Abbat <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 21:24:56 -0400

On Fri, 09 Jun 2000, Jorge Llambias wrote:
>la pier cusku di'e
>
>> So far the word is «nalkempavbivmoiga'imercmu
>flake'exalpixycanja». 
>Is it
>> correct? Should some rafsi be moved around or changed?
>
>You could use jikry- instead of xalpixy-, but hopefully
>you're not seriously thinking of using such a word. 
>Why not just {jikru zercanja} or something like that?
>A lujvo doesn't have to contain a definition in itself,
>and a lot of what is in there seems rather unessential 
>to the concept anyway.

It's a word in the style of German long words. It actually says more than the
German (the German word doesn't mention the 18th amendment), but is shorter.

phma