From rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca Tue Jun 13 22:36:29 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17604 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2000 05:36:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 14 Jun 2000 05:36:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca) (129.97.134.11) by mta3 with SMTP; 14 Jun 2000 05:36:27 -0000 Received: from calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA29087 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 01:36:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200006140536.BAA29087@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: lujvo In-Reply-To: Message from "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" of "Tue, 13 Jun 2000 18:45:36 EDT." <4.2.2.20000613183743.00b8acd0@127.0.0.1> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 01:36:47 -0400 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" writes: >examining the underlying assumptions, or those who talk about Sherlock >Holmes, who is unquestionably a fictional character. (we've been over lo >[unicorn] many times in this forum). OK, I've missed the lo [unicorn] discussion (and I'd use lo [dragon] anyways, since single-horned goats which their breeders call unicorns do in fact exist 'objectively), but assuming that one can say lo [dragon] outside of a fantasy novel without sounding like a moron, I obviously was misinterpreting the implications of lo. I would have read "lo [dragon] klama" as ipmyling something like "Some dragons, oh, by the way, dragons really exist, go", which is apparently wrong. So I take it all back. :) -Robin -- http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. ... stripped of our uniqueness as human beings by Darwin, exposed to our own inadequacies by Freud, ... Power -- "the ability to bring about our desires" -- is all that we have left. --- Michael Korda, _Power!_