From pycyn@aol.com Wed Jun 14 08:05:50 2000
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
Received: (qmail 16140 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2000 15:05:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 14 Jun 2000 15:05:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d08.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.40) by mta3 with SMTP; 14 Jun 2000 15:05:48 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.10.) id a.7a.695aa04 (3937) for <lojban@egroups.com>; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 11:05:43 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <7a.695aa04.2678f947@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 11:05:43 EDT
Subject: The recent flood
To: lojban@egroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41
From: pycyn@aol.com

My apologies for fomenting (or contributing to the fomenting) of the recent 
flood of off-the-point mail on this list. I am even sorrier because it turns 
out that we are pretty much in agreement except for having very different 
ways of expressing our points. I hope we can now get back to talking about 
-- and IN -- Lojban. (Robin's brief statement of his position and the 
discussion of {lo} did move those projects along at least.)
>|83 pc

